Advertising Versus
Direct Marketing for Recruitment
Douglas E. Clark
|
Volume 2, Issue
1 - January 2006
Enrollment managers are, with the possible
exception of those with unlimited budgets,
confronted with the need to make choices
about how their marketing dollars are spent.
When resources are scarce, it is important
to maximize the results from every marketing
dollar.
One ongoing issue is how to divide the
dollars between advertising activities and
direct marketing activities. This article
will argue the dollars spent on direct
marketing have more impact than advertising
dollars. So the next time you are pressed by
admissions “experts” who want you to spend
your scarce recruitment dollars on some
advertising scheme because it will help, in
some vague way, to build “awareness” of the
institution, you need to be ready to counter
with some good arguments.
In
the world of admissions marketing we have
one important advantage. For the most part,
we know who our potential customers are and
we have access to their names (I am speaking
of traditional aged students here, not adult
students). The College Board Student Search
Service, American College Testing and NRCCUA
enable us to purchase the name of almost
every student available for recruitment in a
given cycle. These services allow the
enrolment manager to tailor a request for
names based on an appropriate profile for
the institution using indicators such as
GPA, location and possible major. In
addition, college programs and fairs produce
names of prospective students.
Once you have the names of students in your
data base you are ready to engage in direct
marketing activities that have important
recruitment advantages:
•
Direct marketing allows you to communicate
directly with students who are most likely
to enroll in your institution using multiple
media such as direct mail, email and
telecounseling. These activities facilitate
building a relationship with the potential
student.
•
Direct marketing is ideal for asking
potential students to take a step in the
enrolment process such as filling out an
inquiry card, submitting an application,
visiting the campus, or sending in a
deposit. This also allows you to get
feedback on just how well marketing efforts
are working.
It is important to note that effective
direct marketing requires good data base
management. Keeping track of where students
are in the enrolment process is vital to
effective communication. Staff members who
are skilled at managing the data base are
worth their weight in gold!
Advertising has its role in the world of
marketing, but is not the most cost
effective way for enrolment managers to
recruit students. It is expensive and harder
to control in terms of just who you are
reaching (you pay for those who are not
really potential students to get your
message). It does not allow you to build
relationships, and its impact is harder to
measure unless there is some direct response
action the
student can take like “call this toll free
hotline” (a tag line some colleges may not
find appropriate). To build awareness, a
good public relations operation can utilize
less costly efforts such as courting key
newspapers to get them to run stories about
interesting activities at your institution.
While advertising or sponsoring a popular
radio show may make folks at the institution
feel good about the college, I would suggest
that it is doing very little in the way of
making a measurable impact on recruiting
your class (which needs to be large enough
to make your president feel good about you).
Better to take those advertising dollars and
put them into direct mail, email and
telecounseling!
Douglas E. Clark serves as the Vice
President of Enrollment Management at Ferrum
College.
|