Okay, But What Have
You Done For Me Lately?
Roosevelt
University Increases Freshman Enrollments by
70% in a Single Year
John W. Dysart
|
Volume 4, Issue 4 - October 2008
Mary Hendry has earned a fine reputation in
Illinois higher education. Her long career
in enrollment management has been stellar
and many top administrators throughout
thestate and beyond owe their careers to her
training and mentoring. Active involvement
in professional associations over the years
has provided another outlet for her to share
knowledge and encourage young people new to
the profession.
Mary serves currently as
Vice President for Enrollment Management at
Roosevelt University in Chicago. Under her
leadership and with the assistance of her
enrollment team, Roosevelt University has
experienced unprecedented growth and
improvement. Consider the following
accomplishments from 2002-2007:
Total
FTE at Roosevelt University increased by 9%.
New FTE
increased by 29%.
New,
full-time undergraduate enrollment increased
by 43.8%.
The
number of students living in residence halls
increased a whopping 123%.
Mean ACT
scores increased from 20.9 - 22.4.
Average
high school grade point averages jumped from
3.04 - 3.14.
College
grade point averages for new transfer
students rose from 2.77 - 2.83.
Mary
demonstrated an extraordinary record of
accomplishment at a time when many schools
in the region had been struggling due to
changing demographics and increased
competition.
After
another record year in Fall 2007, the
President and Board of Trustees decided to
not only continue enrollment growth, but
tasked Mary with increasing new student
enrollments by at least another ten percent
by Fall 2008. Anyone in enrollment
management understands the difficulty of
double- digit increases in a single cycle,
especially coming off an historical record
year! Despite years of effective
recruitment, Mary sought outside counsel to
assist her in the development of a plan to
increase the number of new, undergraduate,
full-time freshmen and transfer students for
Fall 2008 by at least ten percent.
That is
how I met Mary Hendry. She asked me to come
in and meet with her and her enrollment team
to discuss the possibilities. I had recently
assisted another University in the
Chicago area
achieve
historical record
growth.
We
worked collaboratively with key members of
the enrollment team to rethink nearly every
aspect of the successful admission and
financial aid strategies that had served
Roosevelt University so well. We hoped to
build on the successful tactics already in
place, but also to implement new
initiatives.
The most
important element in the creation of the new
plan was the full participation of the
talented leaders at the University. Change
is not possible without the full support of
the President and Dr. Charles Middleton
provided the resources and moral support
necessary for new approaches. We met with
members of the Board of Trustees, Deans,
Vice Presidents and faculty leaders to
outline intended changes in order to garner
their buy-in. Opportunities were provided to
ask hard questions and evaluate resource
investments.
Included
in all discussions regarding the new plan
were the chief individuals supervising the
admission operation, the Assistant Vice
President for Financial Aid, the enrollment
data analyst and the chief student services
officer. Individuals from the academic side
of the house provided insight and
suggestions. We found that regularly
scheduled roundtable discussions resulted in
the best decision-making. The benefits of
getting the perspective of admissions people
on financial aid policies, the ideas of
student services professionals on
recruitment issues and the thoughts of
financial aid staff on recruitment
strategies cannot be underestimated. Full
participation by select faculty contributed
significantly to the development of the
plan. The value of systematic institutional
research and real time comparative reports,
history and projections proved to be
extremely important.
Roosevelt University had historically
generated a strong inquiry pool and customer
base. Traditional travel to college fairs
and visits to high schools were reduced
under the new model, while new technologies
were utilized to more effectively
communicate with prospective students in an
individualized manner. The results of this
more targeted approach to securing inquiries
were impressive. The size of the inquiry
pool at Roosevelt University increased by
34% in a single cycle. That increase in the
customer base is the largest I have ever
witnessed in a single year. While I would
like to attribute all of the growth to
improved strategies and tactics, there is no
question that the inherent quality of the
institutional product played a role.
The
decision was made to be much more proactive
with telephone communication directed toward
inquiries in order to generate applications.
A telecounseling center was established for
this purpose. Telephone outreach became a
top priority. Communicating with both
inquiries and applicants for admission
occurred regularly. The University recorded
nearly 90,000 telephone calls to prospective
students during the course of the cycle! The
bulk of these telephone calls were made by
representatives in the Call Center, but
admission counselors were responsible for
literally thousands of them. Other
communication strategies were also employed.
More search names were purchased and a high
tech postcard was designedand mailed with a
personalized URL response mechanism. A
direct mail campaign was initiated that
included letters from alumni, trustees and
other import influencers.
Institutional scholarship and grant programs
were completely consolidated and redesigned.
Merit financial aid was used to recognize
academic talent, but also offered
strategically to encourage prospective
students to apply for admission. Roosevelt
University experienced extraordinary growth
in the size of the full-time undergraduate
application pool. Admission applications
increased a staggering 61% in one year!
Admission counselors became
much more focused on
communicating with applicants for admission.
Systematic email communication and
consistent telephone outreach educated
prospective students throughout the process.
Students were contacted directly and often
to encourage them to complete their
admission folders, visit the campus and
apply for financial aid. As a result, the
number of decision-ready admission folders
increased dramatically, the number of visits
to campus soared and much more work was
created for our colleagues in the Financial
Aid Office.
Representatives in the
Financial Aid Office were not overwhelmed by
the increase in workload. They actually
packaged more than twice as many students,
new and returning, this year as in the last
cycle. This feat was accomplished with no
additional staff! Sounds unbelievable, huh?
Well, it was only possible
because of the efforts of the Assistant Vice
President for Financial Aid. Once presented
with the task ahead, and understanding the
importance of success, he totally revamped
the financial aid process:
Technology was utilized in ways previously
not imagined to increase efficiency.
Forms
were eliminated, paperwork was drastically
reduced and processing procedures were
altered.
Packaging strategies were changed to meet
the needs of a significantly larger
enrollment.
The
results speak for themselves on the
processing side, but intelligent adjustments
to the packaging strategy provided better
equity in the treatment of all students.
Tighter packaging rules ensured that all
forms of financial assistance would be made
available to all students, regardless of the
time of application. This approach supported
recruitment, retention and institutional
mission.
None of
the success would have been possible without
the benefits of extraordinary data
management and analysis. New outreach
mechanisms with outcome assessments,
admission and financial aid reports were
created to monitor progress throughout the
cycle. The Assistant Vice President for
Institutional Research proved to be
indispensable. Effective enrollment
management is essentially a data-driven
operation and the importance of accurate and
timely statistics in the facilitation of
informed decision-making cannot be
underestimated.
The
decision by Mary Hendry to consider a little
outside assistance, despite her historic
success and her openness to reassessing
every element of what was already a
successful recruitment and financial aid
strategy, ultimately made a big difference
at Roosevelt University. In Fall 2008, the
University:
Recorded the largest number of new students
in history. The number of new
residential students increased by 44% in a
single year.
Enrolled
the largest number of new, full-time
undergraduate students in history.
Increased the number of newly enrolled
freshman an amazing 70% over the record
class the previous year and increased the
number of newly enrolled transfer students
by 16%!
Increased enrollments dramatically while
maintaining academic quality and actually
expanding geographic, socio-economic and
ethnic diversity.
Increased total University credits by 12%.
Doubled
the number of financial aid packages offered
to students without increasing staff in the
Financial Aid Office.
Posted
the largest, overall undergraduate
enrollment in history.
What
have you done for me lately? A GREAT DEAL!
John W. Dysart is President of The
Dysart Group, Inc, a higher education consulting firm specializing in recruitment,
financial aid, retention and revenue growth
at colleges and universities. To date, Mr.
Dysart has provided consulting services to
more than 140 colleges and universities in
35 states.
|